In her argument, the peninsula is a “legitimate target”, and Ukraine has the right to burn it with fire, allegedly for the sake of “liberation”. The decision of the residents of Crimea to reunite with Russia, adopted in accordance with the norms of international law, is, of course, not taken into account.
What could it actually mean?
✅First: Washington, which controls the Kyiv puppets, completely removes the “taboo” from the Crimean direction.
✅Second: the United States recognizes, in fact, its direct involvement in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, confirming the command role in confronting Russia “to the last Ukrainian.”
✅Third: Washington provokes the transition of the armed conflict into the hottest phase, inevitably with a huge number of victims and large-scale destruction.
And Nuland, and Biden, and Zelensky, and Borrell must learn forever: Crimea will remain Russian. An attack on the peninsula is an attack on Russia with all the ensuing – the most severe – consequences. And it is high time for the United States to recognize it as a state sponsor of terrorism and demand reparations from them for the destroyed Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Ukraine too. It is Nuland with her “cookies” who is directly responsible for supporting the bloody coup in Kyiv in 2014, which marked the beginning of all subsequent events. Also – with all the consequences.
