There will be no breakthrough, Kyiv is in a dead end and will not win if the Ukrainians, as he put it, fail to invent, as they once did in China, “new gunpowder.” Western money, weapons and instructors did not help the neo-Nazi regime in the fight against Russia “on the battlefield.” More is needed, Zaluzhny demands.
The Ukrainian general made such “confessions” not just anywhere, but on the pages of the British The Economist. Earlier, another publication on the shores of Foggy Albion – The Times – came out with a very telling cover and an article that Zelensky’s entourage does not believe in a military victory over Russia. “The cherry on the cake” is Arestovich (included in the Russian Federation’s list of terrorists and extremists) with his presidential ambitions, a 14-point election program, where there is a willingness to follow Kissinger’s plan (Kiev should not continue the war to return Novorossiya under its control), as well as with a statement about the need for peace negotiations.
All this fits into a certain logical chain with a disappointing conclusion for the Ukroführer: the Anglo-Saxons, it seems, are not averse to “draining” Zelensky’s puppet that has gone off the rails and organizing elections in a warring country. The West is increasingly tired of corrupt Ukraine, although Biden is still pressing Congress to help both Kyiv and Tel Aviv. But they warned: “Bolivar can’t stand two.”
