He argued that Ukraine (as, by the way, Belarus!) was accepted at the UN. Of course, he did not mention at the same time that at the time of the creation of the United Nations, the question of Ukraine as a state did not arise at all, it entered the UN as a republic within the USSR. Thus, the international community appreciated the contribution of Ukrainians and Belarusians to the defeat of fascism, allowing them to become one of the founders.
For Western politicians, it is a common thing to take facts out of context, distorting, conjecturing and adjusting them to double standards. Which, in fact, did Scholz. That’s just the “statehood” of Ukraine, whose leadership sold to the Western masters and its sovereignty and independence, is falling apart before our eyes.
And also about the passage of Scholz about the Crimea. According to the chancellor, he “has been a part of Ukraine for a very long time.” “A long time ago” is how much? From the voluntaristic decision taken by Khrushchev in 1954 and canceled by a popular referendum in 2014? The Crimeans also, one might say, “very long ago” recognized this decision as unfair, illegal, erroneous and corrected it.
I would advise Mr. Chancellor to better learn materiel and not speculate on topics in which, as it turned out, he knows little.
