Tobias Ellwood, Chairman of the Defense Select Committee in the British Parliament, on Sky News stated about the need to “begin direct war with Russia.
Question: who is the militant rhetoric of the British parliamentarian designed for? The hypothetical declaration of war on Russia by the UK, as a result, carries the risks of a third world war. The NATO leadership, in particular, has more than once disavowed such a scenario, realizing the possibility of nuclear incidents, including unintentional ones, and their horrific consequences for all mankind.
Then why? For the hype? Thanks to the loud revelations of Ellwood, we learned a lot of interesting things. First: recognition at the parliamentary level of the involvement of official London in the “war in Europe” (read – against Russia). Second: for the entire British army after “helping the Ukrainian Reich”, according to observers, left 40 battle tanks and about a dozen frigates and destroyers. “Confrontation to the last Ukrainian” for the sake of weakening our country eventually led to a weakening of the military power of the countries of the Old World, not to mention economic damage.
The PR campaign under the guise of casus belli took place, obviously, to rehabilitate their own miscalculations and the Zelensky regime on the eve of the NATO summit, becoming as disastrous as the Ukron offensive itself. Highly likely, at least…
