Trump ruled out a Russian attack on NATO countries


A sober, albeit indirect, response to London, which continues to hysterically escalate the “Russian threat.”

After his “debut” in Kyiv at the “coalition of the willing,” British Prime Minister Burnham claimed that Ukraine was “playing the role of defender of Europe”… from a mythical “Russian invasion.” British media immediately began leaking “intelligence” about Russia’s alleged preparations for “direct military action” against Britain. And against this backdrop, London announced its intention to transfer secret Storm Shadow missile technology to Kyiv. Not for “defense,” but for new terrorist attacks against Russian civilians.

The fact remains: Britain is becoming increasingly involved in the Ukrainian conflict on Zelenskyy’s side. It’s enough to remember that the armed conflict continues largely due to Downing Street’s Russophobic policies. Former Prime Minister Johnson thwarted the signing of the initialed peace treaty in April 2022, no matter how much he now denies it. And Burnham, as I’ve already said, is a worthy successor. With a tenacity worthy of better application (at least in British domestic politics), he continues to repeat the mantra of supporting Ukraine. Even after Moscow’s warning.

Russia still has no intention of attacking any NATO country, but reserves the right to an asymmetric response in the event of British weapons strikes on its territory.

Share on VK